Several problem spaces are explored at once, so where to play is decided by comparison rather than committed to before the research starts.
From 7 Problem Spaces to 4 Validated Concepts in 5 Weeks
Client
Date
$20B+ FMCG company
08/2026
The challenge
A $20B+ Fortune 500 FMCG company was opening up new product categories. Getting from a broad market space to ideas worth testing took three months of manual research, and validating those ideas with real consumers took another three to six months, so the team could pursue only a handful of opportunities a year.
The solution
FifthRow deployed its Market-to-Concept Engine: a broad market space in, consumer-validated concepts out, with human checkpoints at every major decision. The same configuration points at another category by changing its inputs.
7 days
exploration and ideation4.7x
better click-through than benchmarkSeven problem spaces were explored at once rather than one at a time, so the company compared where to play on evidence instead of choosing before the work started.
Core Activities
- Explored seven problem spaces at once, not across a year
- Sized each space by segment, channel and use case
- Mapped competitive landscape and room for a new entrant
- Extracted pain points from reviews, forums and social, not panels
- Segmented needs by context and use case; assessed category momentum
The Results
A validated map of gaps across all seven spaces, and 241 ranked solution ideas attached to the gap and the pain point that produced each one. The company entered concept work with a comparative view of seven spaces rather than a committed view of one.
7 days
brief to ranked ideasThe 241 ideas were narrowed against market reality before anything was built out, and the survivors were expanded into full, decision-ready briefs.
Core Activities
- Ranked every idea on pain, feasibility, differentiation and fit
- Expanded top picks into concepts: user, solution, business model, route to market
- Developed product briefs with USP, revenue streams and segmentation
- Built messaging and positioning for each tested concept
- Prioritised the shortlist to four for live testing
The Results
Nineteen full concepts, ten prioritised for further research, and four complete briefs with messaging and positioning attached, ready to be built as consumer-facing pages.
241
ideas ranked down to 4Each of the four concepts was given its own identity and its own site, so consumer response measured the proposition rather than an established company's reputation.
Core Activities
- Built landing pages on a proven conversion structure
- Developed a distinct identity per concept: name, design, tone
- Set email sign-up as the conversion action, so interest meant action
- Kept every page unconnected to the parent, so each read independently
- Iterated pages on request, no design or development cycle
The Results
Four live consumer-facing sites, each reading as an independent new company, standing and ready to take paid traffic within days of the concepts being chosen.
4
concepts live within daysPaid traffic ran to all four sites in a single national market. The decision was made on what consumers did, not on what they said they would do.
Core Activities
- Ran paid campaigns against relevant consumer audiences
- Iterated ad copy, targeting and budget against live performance
- Collected impressions, clicks, CTR, cost per click and cost per sign-up per concept
- Captured age, gender, income and location breakdowns, plus full-funnel behaviour
- Compared each against published benchmarks, with a validation or invalidation call
The Results
A clear rank order across the four concepts by acquisition cost, with the leading pair separating from the rest on real behaviour. Each concept came back with the positioning that moved consumers, the segments that converted most efficiently, and the point in the funnel where interest dropped off.
341
sign-ups, not stated intentWhat it proved
Seven problem spaces explored in parallel against 5,700+ sources produced 241 ideas in seven days. Nineteen became full concepts, ten were prioritised for further research, four went to live testing. Those four drew nearly 80,000 impressions and 5,427 clicks, returning 341 sign-ups on under $4,500 of the company's own ad spend.
All four beat category benchmarks on click-through, cost per click and cost per sign-up, and the spread gave a defensible rank order: advance, refine, leave. The cycle saved an estimated 2,720 hours of research, ideation and validation before any ad spend. What the company kept was a configured system that points at another category by changing its inputs, tested positioning for every concept, and 341 interested consumers available for follow-up without recruiting anyone.
Results
| Metric | Benchmark | Result | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exploration and ideation | 3 months of manual desk research | 7 days | ~13x faster |
| Cycle time, space to validated concepts | 6 to 9 months | weeks | Months compressed to weeks |
| Click-through rate | 1.46% category benchmark | 6.82% average | 4.7x better |
| Cost per sign-up | $57.40 category benchmark | $13.26 average | 4.3x better |
| Cost per click | $3.29 category benchmark | $0.82 average | 4x better |
Every idea carries a score and a written rationale, so what gets dropped is as defensible as what advances.
Each concept is tested under its own name and identity, so response reflects the proposition rather than the parent company's reputation.
Desirability is measured against paid traffic before development budget is committed, so weak concepts are stopped while stopping is cheap.
Each test returns cost and conversion at every step from impression to sign-up, which separates a weak concept from a weak page.
Every test leaves a group of consumers who registered real interest, available for follow-up research without recruitment.
Recent case studies
From Market Space to Validated Concepts in 4 Weeks
F500 multi-brand CPG company
08/2026
4 weeks
market space to validated conceptsFrom a category scan to test-ready concepts, run by one person
$10B+ global hygiene and health group, corporate venturing unit
09/2026
100,246
analyst-hours equivalent, 117 FTEsMatter More
From a standing start to an AI venture serving small businesses
From 72 patents to 4 commercialisation-ready technologies
Cutting a four-month research cycle to six weeks across five validation workstreams
From a weekly newsletter to a self-running innovation radar
A full year's validated-concept target, met in the first quarter
A utility innovation lab that answers its own questions in a day
Finding the next high-growth US metro in five days
FifthRow – The Agentic Consultancy
Copyright 2026 FifthRow Inc., Privacy policy